Quote Originally Posted by EricU View Post
I guess I didn't make myself clear enough, I don't think the boat's performance is a turd, I think it looks like a big fat turd with those ridiculous graphics that look like he wants a tattoo but his wife wont let him get one. I still find it hard to believe that the big dollar boat companies don't hire an industrial designer for their graphics and interiors.

The guy is the CEO and has graphics that look like a mid-70s lowrider?? WTF. I know to each his own, but that thing looks like a crappy wrap job.

I ordered a 21' Team Edition back in '03 and it looked better than that thing.
I totally disagree with your assessment of the graphics and appearance of the nautiques. I personally thi that they are the best looking boats on the market. I have been obsessing over a nautique for the majority of my adult life and unfortunately cannot afford one because they are so damn expensive. While I do think that they put out one of the best wakes on the market and offer come of the coolest looking graphics and upgrades on the interior, there is no way in hell i would pay 100k for a new boat when my riding skills are comparable to a pontoons ability.

Eric I do agree that the G series is not the best looking boat on the market but the 210 and 230 series is pure heaven in my eyes. Lets face it there are a lot of boats out there that are guly as hell and way worse than the nautique. Have you looked at a Centurion FX series lately that is one ugly ass boat. How about the Supra SA, although I am a Moomba owner and love SC boats, and would love to have an SA I still think that its one ugly boat, it looks like a late 70's corvette.

Bottom line is everyone has their own taste in boats unfortunately my taste is more focused on boats way out of my price range. Still best bang for the buck is a Moomba (although starting to get up there) and Axis (up there already).

No offense to those of you that love the Centurion or SA, I'm sure I will get some nice comments about my opinions