Printable View
As a former driveline engineer, I can tell you that that is bullshit. The driveline angles do not change when you change gear ratios. The only thing that changes is the number of teeth on the drive and pinion gears.Quote:
Originally Posted by dakota4ce
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That's what I was thinking though I'm no engineer. It's just a gear box not a trans as we're familiar with.Quote:
Originally Posted by Stazi
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
But....
I think its more about the size of prop that you would then use with said gear ratio.
I think we all know and realize that the angle would not be correlated with any internal gear ratio.
But if you reduce the ratio, youre gonna want to take advantage of its benefits by ramping up the prop diameter, and that has challenges when it comes to a thrust vector and a forward moving boat coupled with adequate hull clearance.
Again, all heresay. But I like the belligerent BS call! Makes others feel good. 🤣
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yes. With Mastercraft now running a 20 prop on the X-star, then that requires a steeper Driveline angle to for more hull clearance, unless they change the hull design instead.Quote:
Originally Posted by dakota4ce
The other thing is that with lower ratios and bigger props with more pitch (as a consequence) the torque on the Propshafts has seen a major jump, with boats moving towards a 1-1/4 shaft instead of the regular 1-1/8 shaft. This increase in diameter although not trivial, is also questionable whether it is sufficient as there are numerous reports of people shearing the shaft right off with these higher ratio setups.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Exactly what I was alluding to. I dont think the Supra clan is good to go with more angle....yet.Quote:
Originally Posted by Stazi
Heresay. Nothing more with regard to credibility.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Also a worthy consideration!Quote:
Originally Posted by Stazi
I will say this, a recent adventure on an RZX3 with 2:1 was nice. 440 with 17 prop and 2:1 ran very well.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
[QUOTE=Stazi;330090] there are numerous reports of people shearing the shaft right off with these higher ratio setups.
Just hop over to Planet Nautique if you want to read about props shearing clean off of G23s...
Guess there's no convincing you...Quote:
Originally Posted by Shoebox
No they don't! LMAOQuote:
Originally Posted by dakota4ce
:-)Quote:
Originally Posted by korey
No offense to your boat, but I've said it before, I don't like Poop colored interiors, so dark blacks and grays are legit! And blue/black metalflake exterior with blue/black/slate interior is gonna look amazeballs. My Audi is black on black and I love it. Nothing wrong with a murdered out interior if it can not burn ya!Quote:
Originally Posted by larry_arizona
No offense takenQuote:
Originally Posted by trayson
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
for those hoping for the 1.76:1 or 2:1 tranny be careful what you wish for last year with the Malibu 23LSV I had the 400 raptor/1.76:1 combination and the 2279 prop well I ordered the same prop for my SL not knowing that it would have a different ratio. Boat didn't plane as soon as half of the ballast was filled
So obviously a mistake and went to the 2775 (wake prop) which works great. But what is equally important is the RPM now I'm running at 3400 - 3500 when surfing at 11.2. With the Malibu I ran at 3700 - 3800 and with more than 4 people more in the ball park of 4000 anything above 3500 will make the raptor considerably louder
One more thing I heard this year from multiple people on the lake they can't believe how quiet the boat is - you can't hear it nobody told me that last year and both boats were equipped with the fresh air exhaust
So different tranny = higher RPM = more noise and if you really want to know how much here you can get a taste themalibucrew forum discussing 2019 changes there - and read the comments below that video
http://www.themalibucrew.com/index.p...anges/&page=30