Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16

Thread: LSV vs XLV

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Port Byron, IL
    Posts
    86

    Default LSV vs XLV

    If I can get a 09' XLV fully loaded for about $4500 more than an 09' LSV with the same options, is it worth having the extra room for the extra cash? Or does anyone feel its better to save the buck if the extra space isn't needed? I don't really need seating for more than 13 but guess it never hurts right?

    Thanks for your thoughts!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Eugene OR
    Posts
    1,786

    Default

    My personal thought is that i don't want more then 5 other people on the boat at one time. Too many people causes too many problems and gets crazy. I dont know the wake size differance between the two so i can't comment on that.
    2008 Outback V - Sold but never forgotten.
    “Do not wait; the time will never be “just right.” Start where you stand, and work with whatever tools you may have at your command, and better tools will be found as you go along." -Napoleon Hill

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    718

    Default

    It's not really "seating for 13" under normal circumstances. I have an XLV, and I have to say that practical, comfortable all-day seating for adults ends around 8-10. It's about 6-7 for the LSV and Outback.

    Filling all of the seating, you can get about 10 adults in the XLV's interior and another 3 in the bow. However, bow seating has its limitations with its exposure to wind and spray. My passengers love it, but they only use it for extended periods on the warmest, calmest days. If you fill up all the seats, it's pretty inconvenient to get at the under-seat and under-dash storage, as you constantly have to ask people to move around and... oh, all of the other seats are already taken!

    One things about the XLV: its wake is a bit wider than the LSV, especially at lower speeds. Thus, the LSV is easier as a learner's boat, especially if you are bringing children.

    If you can swing it with your crew, finances, tow vehicle and boat facilities, go for the XLV. I did, after seeing both boats in person, and just knowing that I'd want to upgrade before long if I got the LSV. So, to avoid the hassle of that extra transaction, I just went straight for the XLV. It's been great.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    718

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jester View Post
    My personal thought is that i don't want more then 5 other people on the boat at one time. Too many people causes too many problems and gets crazy.
    You have a point there. I guess that my feeling that the fun really starts with 5 people and up stems from the fact that I go out of my way to exclude people who are prone to abrupt horseplay. They are just too dangerous to have around on a boat. It's close quarters and there are too many ways get hurt or drown.

    For example, shoving someone into the water is a good way to lose any future invitations from me. In a pool, a supervising party can rescue the victim. In a lake, the victim can get lungful of water and sink out of sight in a couple of seconds.

    I dont know the wake size differance between the two so i can't comment on that.
    LSV: Nice wake for most riders at a variety of speeds.

    XLV: Awesome wake overall. It is harder to make a smaller wake, though who wants to do that?!? It is easy to make a scary-big wake with both full-load passengers and ballast. With the 2005 hull, I find it a challenge to get the wake's lip smooth below about 19 MPH. The newer hull may fix this.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    California
    Posts
    2,840

    Default

    I average 8-10 peeps on my LSV and rarely feel cramped, but then that is a mix of adults and kids and my previous boat was only a 20'! No offense meant Ian but i fail to see the wider is easier statement, personally coming off of a 7' beam boat it was actually a bit more intimidating going to a 8'+ beam boat, for about 5 minutes!

    The LSV is very roomy (as is the XLV) and has presented us with no problems at all. In Cali the weather is awesome all boating season so the bow seating is never empty. IMO it really comes down to do you have room to store the added length and width of the XLV? Can your vehicle tow the added weight of the XLV?

    Seriously, before you make a decision drive them both then make your mind up. We did and i picked the LSV as i saw no benefit in the XLV for me, but I also drove them both.

    And Ian is right though about the seating, just because it says it can doesn't mean you will or should! 13 is a load and will definately cramp your style!
    2007 Mobius LSV

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    718

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Razzman View Post
    Can your vehicle tow the added weight of the XLV?
    Yes, I should have given more than the briefest mention to tow vehicle. What I should have spelled out was that, if you have to upgrade your tow vehicle to accommodate the XLV, the price difference is a tad more than $4500. Most mid-sized trucks are good towing the LSV, but you'll need an upper-mid-sized truck for local towing or possibly a full-sized truck for extended towing with the XLV. The XLV plus tandem trailer are almost 5000 lbs dry.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Port Byron, IL
    Posts
    86

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ian Brantford View Post
    Yes, I should have given more than the briefest mention to tow vehicle. What I should have spelled out was that, if you have to upgrade your tow vehicle to accommodate the XLV, the price difference is a tad more than $4500. Most mid-sized trucks are good towing the LSV, but you'll need an upper-mid-sized truck for local towing or possibly a full-sized truck for extended towing with the XLV. The XLV plus tandem trailer are almost 5000 lbs dry.
    I'm not all that worried about a tow vehicle for either. I have a 1990 Suburban, a little old, but plenty of ponys under the hood. I dropped a 383 stroker in it, not the best on mpg though. Shouldn't be a problem even with an XLV behind it.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    718

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Razzman View Post
    No offense meant Ian but i fail to see the wider is easier statement
    None taken, because I meant that wider is harder. If you are going slower for beginners and/or small fry, it appears to be easier to get a somewhat narrower, smoother wake with the LSV.

    I also did not mean to imply that the LSV is limited to beginners. I merely meant that it may accommodate some beginners more easily than the XLV.

    One improvement that I am really glad to hear was made in recent models of the LSV is that it now has a deeper hull, with commensurate improvements in the interior space. When I test-drove a 2005 model, its shallow floor made it feel not much bigger than my old 18' I/O.

    Hey, can anyone say how high off of the floor the tower is in the LSV? It used to be 6', which I thought would lead to repeated hilarity as my 6'2" buddy would hit his head. However, the XLV tower ended up being too high for this effect.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    198

    Default

    One of my determining factors for picking the LSV was the interior setup. I love the walk through bow vs the playpen style. I think it is easier moving through when docking plus I am a little anal when people jump on my seats.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Tallahassee, FL
    Posts
    14,071

    Default

    Roach-- you need to upgrade that avatar pic.
    My Mom said I'm not allowed to get wet!
    2008 LSV (sold)
    2000 Outback LS (sold)
    LLTR!!!!!!!!



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •