Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 42
  1. #11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jcredible View Post
    i have been curious on an SA with 400 and how it does. Glad to hear it performs!
    That is good to know. I've been considering doing the 450 motor...

  2. #12
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    4,930

    Default

    My theory is the 400 is plenty for lower elevations. I proved it for my situation.

    Full ballast wakeboard would be last test, but at 100/60/60 with medium crew and 575# lead it rocked 23 mph no problem and the wake was huge.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    2021 Supra SA 400
    2018 Supra SA 400 (SOLD)
    Michigan

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2020
    Location
    Middle Tennessee
    Posts
    736

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by larry_arizona View Post
    My theory is the 400 is plenty for lower elevations. I proved it for my situation.

    Full ballast wakeboard would be last test, but at 100/60/60 with medium crew and 575# lead it rocked 23 mph no problem and the wake was huge.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    I wakeboarded the other day with 100/100/100 + 600 in lead and 5 adults on board. Elevation about 700ft and it did fine. Took a hot minute to plane out but once up it was no issue. That was on the 16x15 prop. The assist of the surf tabs is crucial when that heavy but they do the job admirably.
    2020 Supra SA

  4. #14
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    4,930

    Default Observations of SA near max capacity

    Quote Originally Posted by SONIC View Post
    I wakeboarded the other day with 100/100/100 + 600 in lead and 5 adults on board. Elevation about 700ft and it did fine. Took a hot minute to plane out but once up it was no issue. That was on the 16x15 prop. The assist of the surf tabs is crucial when that heavy but they do the job admirably.
    That is what the PWT boat runs for ballast, maybe they ran a crew of 7.

    Driver, 3 judges, 1 camera man, 2 guests in bow.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    2021 Supra SA 400
    2018 Supra SA 400 (SOLD)
    Michigan

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2020
    Location
    Middle Tennessee
    Posts
    736

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by larry_arizona View Post
    That is what the PWT boat runs for ballast, maybe they ran a crew of 7.

    Driver, 3 judges, 1 camera man, 2 guests in bow.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    They also run the 550 lol
    2020 Supra SA

  6. #16
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    4,930

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SONIC View Post
    They also run the 550 lol
    Yessir and I rode in the 2019 PWT boat and it is a beast.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    2021 Supra SA 400
    2018 Supra SA 400 (SOLD)
    Michigan

  7. #17
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    4,930

    Default Observations of SA near max capacity

    Not the greatest video, but only one we got.

    My niece is 5’9”for reference. She got up her 2nd try.

    But it got from 0-wave in about 5 sec.

    https://youtube.com/shorts/50lxylm2ERI?feature=share


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Last edited by larry_arizona; 07-22-2021 at 03:21 PM.
    2021 Supra SA 400
    2018 Supra SA 400 (SOLD)
    Michigan

  8. #18
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    4,930

    Default

    This is 800# more than we normally run.

    RPM’s were at 3800 versus 3250 with the added weight.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    2021 Supra SA 400
    2018 Supra SA 400 (SOLD)
    Michigan

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    north texas
    Posts
    1,164

    Default

    Oh man that rope had me so nervous!!! Had a buddy a few weeks ago almost get his man boob nipple ripped off. Fell forward and rope ripped under his armpit. Crazy rope burn.

    Wave looks incredible though!


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    2017 Supra SA

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    114

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by larry_arizona View Post
    This is 800# more than we normally run.

    RPM’s were at 3800 versus 3250 with the added weight.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

    After reading this I calculated what we had for passenger weight when I was having issues maintaining surf speed recently. We had 2400 In passengers plus 900 in lead and all full. 4200 rpms and the 450 struggled.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •