Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    1,382

    Default Swell 3.0 feedback

    Anyone who is familiar with Swell 2.0–have you ridden Swell 3.0?

    Any feedback to offer?

    Wave shape
    Push
    Length
    Etc;


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    532

    Default

    Wake 9 will be coming out with a review of the Supra SL with 3.0 soon. He has an SE with 2.0 so that'll give you a good idea of the differences.

  3. #3

    Default

    I am very interested to know if these larger plates make a hugh difference. The surface area on the new swell plates have increased dramatically.

    Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    1,382

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by steinkda1984 View Post
    I am very interested to know if these larger plates make a hugh difference. The surface area on the new swell plates have increased dramatically.

    Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
    Actually, I believe this isn’t true. The articulating portion of the plate is damn near exactly the same size as 2.0. What has changed is the “between plate” part that doesn’t move. It moves the articulating part further out from the transom and puts it at a 30 degree rough angle. Much like a Tige TAPS 3 plate orientation.

    It’s really really close, they’re 97% exactly the same size. The difference is their position in space relative to the transom.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    1,382

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mobius22 View Post
    Wake 9 will be coming out with a review of the Supra SL with 3.0 soon. He has an SE with 2.0 so that'll give you a good idea of the differences.
    I would really love an apples to apples—SE 2.0 to SE 3.0. A perfect scientific experiment. But that’s likely not gonna happen unfortunately.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    Crystal Lake, IL
    Posts
    56

    Default

    I’m interested in this as well.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  7. #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dakota4ce View Post
    Actually, I believe this isn’t true. The articulating portion of the plate is damn near exactly the same size as 2.0. What has changed is the “between plate” part that doesn’t move. It moves the articulating part further out from the transom and puts it at a 30 degree rough angle. Much like a Tige TAPS 3 plate orientation.

    It’s really really close, they’re 97% exactly the same size. The difference is their position in space relative to the transom.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    My bad, I have the original Swell which is much smaller than Swell 2.0. My swell doesn't have the "between plate". The articulating or hinged plate is bolted to the transom.

    Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    1,382

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by steinkda1984 View Post
    My bad, I have the original Swell which is much smaller than Swell 2.0. My swell doesn't have the "between plate". The articulating or hinged plate is bolted to the transom.

    Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
    That makes sense, they did increase dramatically in size between 1.0 and 2.0. Version 3.0 is a position change and does a lot (purportedly) to aid in wave cleanliness with even weighting. Apparently you can fill all, press button, get clean wave.

    I checked to see if they sell 3.0 plates. As suspected, no. It’s a “safety concern” which is a straw man excuse, but one they have to make in this litigious capitalistic world.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •