Supra sa 400 vs 440

[mcjimmy33]

Wow didn't realize it was THAT much heavier. OK so maybe 440. Still wonder why someone cant get an ECM from a 440 and plug it on their 400. Best way to know would be drive them both. Depending on where in the power band you get the extra torque it may or may not be useful. Its only 27lb-ft after all from the 400 to 440. Seems like the decision should be 400 vs 575.

[MJHSupra]

Seems like the decision should be 400 vs 575.

Cha-Ching $$$$$

[KnoxMojo]

Go with the 575 and never leave yourself wondering "what if".....The PWT boat is an SA with the 575, had the pleasure to ride it a couple times last year fully loaded, I could never imagine my Mojo with the 400, even with a high alt torque prop, pulling that sort of weight.

[russellsmojo]

The 575 $18k will be staying in my bank account.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[patrick232]

I have a SR400 with the 1235 prop and it runs well. But riding in the PWT surf boat with the 575 and extra weight can't disclosure, was WOW. Not sure $18k wow.

[mikemskater]

I have a 16 SA400 with the 2775 prop. I'm only at about 700 ft elevation but I run 5000 lbs of ballast and at least 4 people. I run under 3500 RPM's when surfing at 11 MPH. I just personally cannot justify the price difference of a 440 for those couple of ft lbs of torque in a remapped tune. Higher altitude could always prop more aggressive than a 2775.

[shockthis]

Wow , what is your surf wave like with 5000lbs? Did you get bigger bags?

[mikemskater]

Yes I have custom bags and the wave is incredible.

[shockthis]

What size bags did you get for the rear? I can't remember if there is already a bow sac in the front or if it is a hard tank?

[padge]

I surfed a 2018 Supra sa today with stock ballast. Wave was pretty good with autowake off. Was very soft and lacked push with autowake on. But I'm used to a 25' Malibu with 6000#'s of ballast. Needless to say I'm going to try and buy the Supra.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk