New for 2019

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by KnoxMojo

Listed waves have a lot of power, but the surf systems create a better wave and keeps you in the pocket more like an ocean wave instead of always surfing down a hill per say

---

My boat listed is really too powerful. It kills your calves trying to put the break on all the time. After surfing even, then going listed, I didn’t much care for the listed wave. Def doesn’t lack any push lol


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dakota4ce

No offense specifically to Stazi— but I personally think that it’s horse crap when this particular shaming comes out on the forum. Who in their right mind would not be more in favor of burning 6 gallons per hour versus 12? Especially if you have a 60 gallon tank and you need to purchase fuel on the lake—it actually makes a difference. But whatever. Just because someone buys an expensive boat really has nothing to do with whether not they value a few bucks here and there.

But you guys can have your way with me—I’m sure this is an unpopular stance. Because I have an expensive boat I should just probably dump fuel into the lake just for fun. 🤣


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

---

Fuel burn matters to me. I'm on track for an easy 4k in gas this year. let's call depreciation at 8k/year on a 100k boat. That's significant.

Oh and 4k in cash spent equates to how much in income before taxes???? Good thing I have friends who help pay the fuel bill.

I don’t think it’s shaming, but it’s a known part of wake boating. The mass of these boats and the load on these engines are high.

That said, the raptors sip gas compared to older GM LS based options. I have not talked to anyone with a new DI LT based GM engine, but I have to imagine they will do best on gas.






Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by larry_arizona

I don’t think it’s shaming, but it’s a known part of wake boating. The mass of these boats and the load on these engines are high.

That said, the raptors sip gas compared to older GM LS based options. I have not talked to anyone with a new DI LT based GM engine, but I have to imagine they will do best on gas.






Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

---

You missed the shaming portion— anytime someone asks about fuel economy there’s always someone who says why should you care you spent $100,000 on a boat (or something like that).


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Stanzi just made an offhanded joke and got slapped for it. This is a great board and I enjoy listening to all you rich guys. Lol

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

It’s not the first time that dagger has been tossed. It’s old hat.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dakota4ce

It’s not the first time that dagger has been tossed. It’s old hat.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

---

Gotcha, I am a newb, missed the joke, therefore it’s on me lol!!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Slapped? [emoji23] ok.... whatever sinks your boat brah!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

New 19 Supra info dropping today!

Attachment 27382

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dakota4ce

No offense specifically to Stazi— but I personally think that it’s horse crap when this particular shaming comes out on the forum. Who in their right mind would not be more in favor of burning 6 gallons per hour versus 12? Especially if you have a 60 gallon tank and you need to purchase fuel on the lake—it actually makes a difference. But whatever. Just because someone buys an expensive boat really has nothing to do with whether not they value a few bucks here and there.

But you guys can have your way with me—I’m sure this is an unpopular stance. Because I have an expensive boat I should just probably dump fuel into the lake just for fun. 🤣


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

---

Totally agree with you. No shame!