Ethanol vs non-ethanol, problems?
I’ve recently realized that only one lake around me sells non-ethanol 89 fuel (4.70/gal). My next best option is to drive an hour for 93 non-ethanol (3.69/gal). After those two options I’m looking at using regular premium 93 pump gas. Which would be the most convenient option as the boat stays on the trailer. I’ve only ran non-ethanol this far 50ish hours on the boat so far.
Can someone explain what the real difference is if I’m using 93 non-ethanol vs 93 pump gas with ethanol?
Is there any problems that regular pump gas could cause over time?
2018 Moomba Craz
Ethanol vs non-ethanol, problems?
MLA is 100% correct.
My boat calls for 89 octane e10
I personally use top tier mix on 87/93 to make 90 octane E10
I use startron fuel additive as well.
OP,
Indmar designed the raptors for E10, I believe they recommend running Lucas fuel treatment.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Ethanol vs non-ethanol, problems?
In a boat, Ethanol is bad due to being hydroscopic (water absorbing), but this is why 10% is the limit.
For high performance use, E85 (up to 85% ethanol) is poor mans race gas at appx 105 octane.
You can make serious power running E85 especially in forced induction applications.
Just an awful idea in a boat that lives on the water.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk